Skip to content

Don’t Vote – It Encourages Them!

Te Kara 1834







Apparently there’s a general election in New Zealand in a couple of weeks. Haven’t paid it much attention to be honest, such is the likely absurdity and irrelevance of the narcissistic bickering that has no doubt gone down.

However we thought we’d share this little nugget with you.

Whoever you vote for in Parliament, you still get Parliament. And with Parliament, you still get the Crown. And the Crown does not work for you. It works for its creditors.

So, voting? It’s called a false choice, mateys!

It doesn’t matter, you see, if the goons in the Beehive are mostly right-wing, or left wing, or somewhere in the middle. They will still, such is the nature of the Crown, hurt you – whether it’s by right-hooking you for three years, or left-hooking you, or just kicking you straight in the nuts. Alternatively, as with the unanimous passing of the Food Bill, they’ll all gang up and lay it on you at the same time.

“How is this possible?” you may cry. “How was I deceived thusly, and left with a swollen face, and such sore nuts?”

Well, it’s because the Crown is not what most people think it is (if they’ve thought about it at all). As we’ve said before, the Crown is in fact set up as a corporate vehicle for transferring the material wealth of this nation via securities – principally from the people of this country, and principally to the international banks that lend New Zealand paper or electronic money at interest.

This Crown corporation – and it is a corporation – is registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. It’s called Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Zealand. Just go online and check it out. You’ll even find listings of its assets and liabilities, complete with its “legal” claims – all key info for corporate asset-strippers.

Not convinced? Well, think about it. We’ve had a banker Prime Minister for six years. During that time, the national debt has gone through the roof and our dear leader has been selling off the nation’s assets and mineral rights all over the place, with the justification of paying off the debts that HE hooked up for HIS international banker friends. Of course he’s sold the nation’s assets for a song, too, and probably to the same people he arranged the loans with, or to his other mates, or simply to himself.

The dude has mortgaged the country to the hilt. You’re paying for it with poverty and pollution. And it is all possible through the vehicle that is the Crown. Is this not self-evident?

Vote Labour and expect more of the same, just with a different colour. You’ll still get Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Zealand and its vampire creditors. They’ll just be chewing on another part of you. Whichever part you choose, actually.

So what is the point of this post? It’s about Mandate. If less than half the eligible voters vote, then under the true principles of democracy the Crown does not have a mandate to rule. That’s the way we see it, anyway, because we have a brain. If more than half the eligible voters vote, then the Crown does have a mandate.

Chances are that more than half will vote (probably 52% or thereabouts) and chances are that most of those will vote for the banker – this in spite of the fact that bankers have been self-evident scum since the 2008 financial crisis, and also in spite of the fact that he’s selling off our national assets and vast chunks of conservation land for mining.

If more than half vote and he does get in, then the enormity of the ignorance of the people of this nation will have revealed itself. If more than half vote and the other fella swings it (whoever he is) then expect fun and games of a different sort. Either way, you’ll have to live with it, and you’ll have yourself and your fellow kiwis to thank.

However if 51% of eligible voters think “screw it” and go to the pub instead (assuming they can afford to) – then, and only then, will you actually have something to celebrate. Because the Emperor will be democratically revealed as having no clothes. That is, by the numbers.

Are you going to be part of that 51%? We hope so!

Remember, if you vote, you’re just voting in the Board of Directors of a company that wants your stuff, so it can give it to its creditors. Nothing more. All legislation is written with this transfer of your wealth in mind. Read it, and you’ll see. They’re called Bills, after all. Bills you pay – through fines, taxation, polluted water, even imprisonment (which contrary to popular opinion makes money for the state, through goods produced and as a hedge against people not being a compliant little tax slaves).

So, don’t vote. Don’t listen to children like Lorde either, who say you your vote counts but know nothing of the above. Just take the day off, raise a glass and proclaim the toast: “No clothes!”

Then look for the voter turnout stats, not the relative number of votes cast. Those stats will reveal the true winner.

Without a Crown mandate, what comes next would be uncertain. But we have faith that with the public a tad more educated, reason will prevail.

May the force be with you.

Please share, and consider donating.

Kia ora.


Treason in Parliament

Treason is defined as “The crime of betraying one’s country, especially by attempting to kill or overthrow the sovereign or government” (Oxford English Dictionary). It is further defined as “The betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith” ( It comes from the Latin traditio(n-) ‘handing over’.

>Please SHARE at bottom<

It seems, therefore, that handing over control of New Zealand’s food supply to a foreign power – especially when doing so is likely to harm the people of the country – would rather fit the bill.

Yet that is exactly what is going to happen this week, perhaps as early as tomorrow, when the Food Bill is “approved” by the parties in Parliament. That’s right, they’re probably not even going to vote on it, such is its unanimous support. There was no vote for its second reading, despite 43,000 people signing a petition opposing it – it was just rubber-stamped under the smokescreen of the Budget.

Sure, there was a close vote on what would have been a useful amendment to the Bill (introducing Country of Origin labelling). But that was a sideshow, and a rather obvious one, designed to give the impression that the Food Bill was not a done deal already – and only for anyone who was looking. The whole treatment has been a smoke and mirrors job, and everyone in Parliament has been complicit, or at best negligent. This represents a collective and cynical breach of the public trust.

So how exactly does the Food Bill hand over control of the food supply, and to whom? We should be sure of this, as should our Members of Parliament (some of them have been informed directly – particularly those on the Select Committee, through notices given to them. The rest, if doing their job, should have investigated the rumours).

Well, it binds the Crown, and its subjects, into adhering to regulations that have not yet been published but will be put in place by Orders in Council made by the Governor-General (on the recommendation of a Minister). These regulations will be made to, under Section 314 (b) (iia) “give effect to New Zealand’s obligations under a relevant international agreement, convention, protocol, or treaty” (even if these have not yet been agreed).

And in case you’re wondering what an Order in Council is, it’s basically law by decree that is only normally used in an emergency, and is immune from Parliamentary oversight. From Wikipedia, which is basically right on this issue: “Traditionally, Orders in Council are used as a way for the Prime Minister to make political appointments, but they can also be used to issue simple laws as a sort of decree. Often in times of emergency, a government may issue legislation directly through Orders in Council, forgoing the usual parliamentary procedure[3][4]” (

So to be completely clear, the Food Bill basically allows the Government to use emergency powers to make regulations that are in keeping with international agreements – even though we do not yet know what those regulations or agreements are.

We’ve got a good idea, though. The principal obligations that the bill refers to are New Zealand’s obligations under Codex Alimentarius (see here – NZ is obligated under FSANZ with Australia). Codex is a rulebook for food production and sale straight out of the USA’s Food and Agriculture Organisation – a body that is basically just a front for big agribusiness (yes, especially Monsanto). And the rulebook is being forced on all World Trade Organization members, with the threat of the loss of trade if they do not comply.

The Food Bill is not about Food Safety, it’s about trade – and control. In fact it’s going to push up the price of food massively through regulations – expect basic staples prices to double in two to three years. If this combines with a further financial collapse (which is coming, due to the pyramidal architecture of the Fractional Reserve Banking system, though of course that’s not mentioned here)… well, then you could seriously see kiwis starving. Some are already.

And set against this picture, if New Zealanders sell or even barter food without permission from the Government – even if it is to prevent people going hungry in their communities – they can be fined $100,000 and thrown in prison for two years (Section 203 (3) (b)).


Anyone disagree?

This is some sick stuff that is going down. Don’t be fooled. The bill is about control, greed and service to big business by parliamentarians who, everyone thinks, are supposed to be working for the people of the country.

Fortunately there are ways to get around the Food Bill – soon to be the Food Act. But it will require people to wake up from the principal illusion that parliament, and government, work for the people. They do not.

It will also require people to look to their own power, agency and – should they have it – sovereignty. And then use it.

More soon.

Kia ora.

PS The common law crime of misprision of treason is knowing that a treasonous act is going to take place and doing nothing to stop it. It applies both to Parliamentarians who don’t break ranks with their party and, well, you, if you don’t do something about it.

The following may be useful ;-)

Police – Wellington Central

41 Victoria St, Wellington Central, Wellington, PO Box 693 New Zealand
Phone: +64 4 381 2000 Fax:+64 470 1600


Food Bill Final Vote: Pots and Pans Protests Sunday

It’s time to hit the streets – this Sunday at 1pm, then Parliament House on Tuesday 20 May at 9am.

The Food Bill surrenders New Zealand’s sovereignty, yet passed its second reading this week with full Parliamentary support. Its third and final reading is due on Tuesday (it nearly happened yesterday). This gives a very limited period to show your opposition. And it needs to be LOUD.

>Please share widely, below<

The bill surrenders our sovereignty in both domestic and international food policy, as demonstrated by this website and multiple submitters to the Primary Production Select Committee. The Select Committee has even admitted this in its revised commentary to the bill, and the government freely admits it here (NZ is a member of FSANZ and the WTO):

The bill, in conjunction with the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, essentially means that overseas corporations such as Monsanto would control our food supply via the World Trade Organization and the US Food and Agriculture Organisation. Then, with the massive regulation the Food Bill would bring, the price of food would also rise sharply.

Finally, under Sections 355 and 346 of the bill, the Governor-General would be able to declare anyone or anything a Food Business and regulate them out of existence. And he’d be getting his orders via international directives and moneyed interests. Boom.

There’s been no media coverage of the second reading, despite 40,000 people signing an online petition which opposed the bill. Also, it’s being rushed through at the same time as the Budget, so expect news of that to eclipse the Food Bill pretty comprehensively – that is the government’s intention – unless you MAKE your voice heard.

And you should. There is a concerted effort underway to deceive you with the Parliamentary process and take away your rights as New Zealanders. The bill jumped from number 36 on the Parliamentary Order Paper last Thursday to number one on Tuesday, a pretty sly move. Then, two readings were attempted during Budget week.

Last but not least, the planned final reading for yesterday would even have coincided with a full moon, which should be significant for the occultists – and gardeners – among you. It certainly would have been significant for Parliament. Presumably they only dropped the ball on that in their frenzy to relieve you of money via the Budget. Well, now you can get your own back.

Share widely and fast, please. The streets on Sunday are step one. Step two is Parliament before the third reading (scheduled Tuesday). Step three is Government House, before the bill gets Royal Assent – time and date TBC. At which point, feel free to use the phrase “treason in parliament” at will. Actually, you could do so now – because it’s happening.

Kia ora. Bring your pots and pans!

Where and when:

1pm, Sunday 18 May:
Aotea Square, Queen Street, Auckland
Cuba Street water buckets, Wellington
The Octagon, Dunedin
Other locations TBC – email with suggestions please

9am, Tuesday 20 May
Parliament House, Wellington, prior to third reading.

Please consider donating, so we can do as much as possible to stop this bill. Thanks.

Food Bill Submissions close tomorrow 16 August

*URGENT FOOD BILL NEWS* Share widely and fast – click here to make a last-minute, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED submission on the Food Bill, today or tomorrow 16 August 2013 (sample text follows):-  [Scroll to bottom of the page, enter the captcha code and click “make an online submission”.]

Right-click and open in a new window: Share on Facebook


We suggest that you:-

1. Notify the Select Committee that you oppose the Food Bill and MInister Nikki Kaye’s proposed amendments to it. It is still set to destroy New Zealand’s food sovereignty, by making all food trade follow as-yet-undefined international directives and regulations. Nikki Kaye’s proposed amendments in fact seem to further the destruction of that food sovereignty. These directives would come from the World Trade Organization in collusion with multinational food corporations (via Codex Alimentarius). Goodbye farmers’ markets, health food shops etc, which would be regulated and cost-complianced out of existence.

2. Reserve All Rights. Make it clear that you do not ‘submit’ to the process of enactment of the bill. Place brackets around the Header [Submission], following it up with Public Notice as below. Write All Rights Reserved on your submission. Note that passing the bill as is would seem to be a breach of the Treaty of Waitangi (the indigenous language version, which is the lawfully binding one under international law) and that Nikki Kaye’s proposed amendments would probably further breach the Treaty.

3. Keep a copy of your ‘submission’. Send us this at, with your Submission Reference Number as proof of delivery if you wish, and we can publish it.

4. Choose to speak to your submission before the Select Committee. When you speak, reserve all rights. Make sure they ‘understand’ you :-)

Sample text for ‘Submission’

Write your own text, or feel free to copy and paste the following text into the “Compose a brief submission” field on the submissions page. If you have problems pasting into the field, like some folks, paste into a word or text doc and upload that.

Note that the suggested text below has changed, as submissions on this matter are arguably supposed to deal just with the amendments from the Supplementary Order Paper and not any other matters in relation to the Food Bill (at least, the amendments are what Parliament is supposed to consider next). So a general rant about the bill seems to be out… but don’t worry if you already did one – this is foremost about changing opinion :-)

The submissions page itself is accessed via this link: [Scroll to bottom of the page, enter the captcha code and click “make an online submission”.]

>Suggested text starts here<

[Submission] *

Public Notice

Friday 16 August 2013

To the members of the Select Committee for the Food Bill, Supplementary Order Paper 278

All Rights Reserved

I absolutely oppose the Food Bill and SOP 278.

The bill as it stands, that is without the Supplementary Order Paper’s proposed amendments, would generally subject this country to as-yet-undefined international food directives that infringe its sovereignty.

Further, the Supplementary Order Paper’s proposed amendments would exacerbate this situation by reinforcing the international directives and also, it seems, denying remedy for the infringements of sovereignty.

As such, the Food Bill and its Supplementary Order Paper together seem to represent a potential breach of the Treaty of Waitangi (the lawful, indigenous version). This is because they would adversely affect the people of this country’s undisturbed possession of, and sovereignty over, their domestic food supply. The food supply is a taonga, a treasure necessary for life, and it is protected under the Treaty of Waitangi.

The bill as it stands, that is without the Supplementary Order Paper’s proposed amendments, already challenges this country’s sovereignty in respect of its food supply as follows:-

1: Section 346 (Regulations about standards in relation to food) proposes to subject our food to as-yet-undefined international treaties and standards (Section 346, (5) (c),(d)).

2: Section 404 (References to standard works) proposes to directly obligate the Crown, when formulating food standards and regulations, to refer to works “accepted internationally” – even if these are works in progress and are as yet undefined.

However the bill as it stands, without the Supplementary Order Paper’s proposed amendments, does also seem to provide potential remedy for breaches of the country’s sovereignty and the Treaty of Waitangi by offering, without express impediment from foreign interests, the possibility of “Exemptions by Order in Council from application of the Act generally” under section 314.

Unfortunately, the Supplementary Order Paper’s proposed amendment at Section 315 (b) (iia) seems to introduce the potential for an express impediment from foreign interests, because under this amendment the Minister would not be able to recommend Exemptions under section 314 without first taking into account “the need to give effect to New Zealand’s obligations under a relevant international agreement, convention, protocol, or treaty”.

Since the Governor-General appears to only be able to make Exemptions under Order in Council on the recommendation of the Minister, the Supplementary Order Paper’s proposed amendment at Section 315 (b) (iia) seems to deny remedy to anyone wishing to exercise the sovereignty guaranteed by the Treaty of Waitangi in respect of the undisturbed possession of their taonga that is their food supply.

Further, and unfortunately, the agreements, conventions, protocols or treaties to which the Supplementary Order Paper refers (such as Codex Alimentarius) seem to have been formulated generally to benefit international corporate interests in the pharmaceutical and agribusiness industries, and thus seem likely to cause harm to this country and its people by setting international corporate interests against the interests of the country and its people.

I put it to you, as public servants and upon your Oaths of Office, that the Food Bill and its Supplementary Order Paper hereby seem to represent a breach of the Treaty of Waitangi on the issue of sovereignty, and as such should be abandoned. I expect you to recommend this.

If you cannot, then I require you to either inform me as to why or recuse yourselves immediately from this Select Committee.

I require 10 days’ notice prior to speaking with you on this matter.


[your name]

All rights reserved

* [Submission] is for Noticing Purposes exclusively

>Suggested text ends< 

Right-click and open in a new window: Share on Facebook

Finally, you should be pretty annoyed if you have only just heard about submissions being open. The Green Party released the information this week on its website, and there has been no media coverage that submissions have reopened (and are about to close). The news has instead been full of the GCSB, snapper quotas and, now, proving you’re a fit parent if you wish to see your children.

This is called stage-show magic, focus relocation, schooling… and the Government has basically, cynically, won the day in keeping this news away from you, by dangling other rights-infringing proposals in front of the media.

Get your own back. Make a submission on the Food Bill reserving all rights. And please share far and wide, and fast, so others can do so too.

Thank you / tena koutou.

Right-click and open in a new window: Share on Facebook


Constitution Conservation: Protect The Treaty

Share on Facebook


NZ Food Security is into its third year, and after a lengthy absence we’ve decided to get things rolling again – this time with the publishing of a formal notice to the NZ Constitutional Advisory Panel, which closed to submissions today. It was written by the journalist who first broke the story on the Food Bill’s problems in Organic NZ magazine, and is copied below.

Meanwhile, the serious issues with the Food Bill are far from being fixed, despite it getting a new face in the form of MP Nikki Kaye following Kate Wilkinson’s departure. In particular, there is minimal transparency in relation to the changes apparently being undertaken in response to the huge public outcry that we are very happy you, the New Zealand public, made over the bill. Check back here for a summary soon.

More broadly, the Crown seems to be merely dishing up more rights-depleting legislation for the country in the form of the GCSB and TPPA Bills (and probably a bunch of others we are not even aware of).

On the positive side, however, very large numbers of people do seem to be waking up to the fact that all is not as it seems on TV – and that a bunch of control-freak globalists are indeed trying to line their dirty little pockets with the wealth of New Zealand.

Waking up is quite different, of course, from getting out of bed and doing something. But it’s a step in the right direction. Don’t let the day run away with you :-)

Share on Facebookdonate


Public Notice

31 July 2013

To the Members of the Constitutional Advisory Panel as described at via

for the attention of all people living in the land commonly
known as New Zealand


Guy Christopher (family name Ralls), adopted as Kahukura Peita under tikanga by Hone Peita, Rangatira of Te Wairaki hapu, Panguru, Aotearoa / the North Island of the landmass commonly referred to as New Zealand.


Emeritus Professor John Burrows QC, Sir Tipene O’Regan, Ngāi Tahu; Peter Chin; Deborah Coddington; Hon Sir Michael Cullen; Hon John Luxton; Bernice Mene; Dr Leonie Pihama, Te Ātiawa, Ngā Māhanga a Tairi, Ngāti Māhanga; Hinurewa Poutu, Ngāti Rangi, Te Āti Haunui a Pāpārangi, Ngāti Maniapoto; Professor Linda Tuhiwai Smith, Ngāti Awa, Ngāti Porou; Peter Tennent; Dr Ranginui Walker, Te Whakatōhea; and anyone else appointed to the Constitutional Advisory Panel as described at from time to time by New Zealand Government representatives of the foreign entity registered with United States Securities and Exchange Commission known as Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Zealand, registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, registrant # 216105$/SEC/Registrant.asp?CIK=216105

Capacity in which this Notice is made: by myself as a whangai, that is as a adoptive native of this land, with all of the rights and privileges of a British subject but without subjugation; and as a beneficiary of the Express Trust constituted by both He Whakaputanga 1835 The Declaration of Independence of Niu Tireni which was given Royal Assent by means of Letters Patent by King William IV and ratified by the British Parliament and its subsequent variation Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840 indigenous version, which is superior to the English version of the same year under the International Law rule of Contra Proferentem on the issue of Sovereignty, that is, with the Sovereignty of this land being retained by the Rangatira of the various districts under Tino Rangatiranga.

Take Notice That:

1 The process that you are individually involved in regarding possible changes to New Zealand’s constitutional arrangements is an internal process of the New Zealand Crown corporation known as Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Zealand registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, registrant # 216105$/SEC/Registrant.asp?CIK=216105.

2 Being an internal process of that corporation, the process is bypassing the True Foundational Constitution of this land commonly known as New Zealand but constitutionally in fact Niu Tireni, that being He Whakaputanga 1835 The Declaration of Independence and its subsequent variation, Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840 indigenous version.

3 This True Foundational Constitution is an arrangement between the Rangatira of the various rohe or districts of this land by blood and the heirs and successors of King William IV, and is an Express Trust created for the benefit of the men, women and children living in this land.

4 This True Foundational Constitution can not be amended or annulled by any arrangement explicit, implicit or otherwise between the New Zealand Crown corporation known as Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Zealand and legal persons subject to that corporation as the aforementioned corporation and legal persons were not and are not parties to the agreement that created the True Foundational Constitution of this land (being He Whakaputanga 1835 The Declaration of Independence and its subsequent variation, Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840 the indigenous version).

5 Furthermore the Constitutional Advisory Panel that you are each individually party to is only of an Advisory nature, is only reflective of views of persons not necessarily verified to have any standing in respect of any Constitutional amendments, has no ability to contract and is itself appointed by representatives of the aforementioned corporation who appear legally to be under no obligation whatsoever to act on the views of the people of this land that you may or may not accurately communicate to them.

6 However notwithstanding the above, the process has been put to the people living in this land as a lawful means of bringing changes to the True Foundational Constitution of this land when it is not. This appears to be a general breach of the trust of the people of this land, as well as an explicit breach either by impost or delegation of the Express Trust, True Foundational Constitution of this land (being He Whakaputanga 1835 The Declaration of Independence and its subsequent variation, Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840 the indigenous version).

7. These breaches could cause actual loss or harm to the beneficiaries of this Express Trust as well as to the Rangatira by blood to the original signatories of the agreement between themselves and King William IV and their hapu, that is both to the non-indigenous and indigenous people of this land.

8. The actual loss or harm could principally but not exclusively come about in the following manner subsequent to the Protections of the Express Trust True Foundational Constitution of this land being removed (whether in appearance or in actuality):-

(i)             By the acquisition of property by corporations subject to the Crown by means of fraudulent bank lending practices under this land’s Fractional Reserve Banking System whereby land or other property is used as security for funds that purport to be derived from Loans / Lending but are in fact debt-based funds created directly by a loan application processes (this Fractional Reserve Banking System being approved and supported by the New Zealand Government).

(ii)            These debt-based funds can only be created (and a subsequent apparent debt incurred) in this system if there is a corresponding credit balance in any bank’s balance sheet. Thus the amount of debt in circulation is subject to the amount of credit, and the money supply is grown through a dualistic credit / debt monetary system, devaluing savings.

(iii)           Due to the interest differential between the credit side and debit sides of the general public banking balance sheet (where debts incur higher rates than credits are paid) this dualistic monetary system inevitably results in a much larger amount of public debt being owed than there is public credit (“money”) to service it.

(iv)          At this point (which we have been at since 2008) people in this land inevitably lose property to banks due to debt. However these debts were all initially incurred by fraud, purporting to be from loans when in fact no money was lent but the money merely created by the apparent loan process.

(v)           Furthermore, when the amount of credit (“money”) in circulation needs to be increased to stop a complete financial collapse as nearly seen in 2008, any government needs to create bonds to raise credit via its central bank for introduction into the monetary supply. The bonds in this land are largely created, it seems, against the labour of our men and women through a growing multiplicity of statutory fines, taxes and governmental fees, as well as via international lending secured against the taonga (minerals, resources) of this land that are supposed to be protected under the True Foundational Constitution of this land but could be lost if the national debt cannot be repaid.

(vi)          This banking system is predatory and fraudulent, and the people of this land are collectively suffering as a result. Furthermore this system has been standard banking practice since money ceased to be backed by anything of substance in this land, such as gold, and it has resulted in a large transfer of wealth from the people to bank shareholders.

(vii)         This banking system through its necessary banking bailouts and bond creation creates servitude and diminishes the quality of life of the people of this country.

(viii)        Ultimately the beneficiaries of this banking system are the principal shareholders of the largest and oldest banks – banks that are large enough to buy up failing banks along with the securities those failed banks acquired on their fraudulent loans; banks that are large enough to finance governments in exchange for securities on the human labour of the people (via court bonds, increased taxes etc) and the resources of their country.

(ix)          Thus through the processes of commerce and banking taking place in this land, as overseen by “former” banker and Prime Minister of Government John Key, the actual beneficiaries of the production and resources of this land appear to be generally Mr Key’s former employers (large bank shareholders and their associates) and not the people of New Zealand, who are supposed to be benefiting from the True Foundational Constitution of this land but are not.

(x)           Via complete banking collapse or the continuous bailouts that are the inevitable result of the Fractional Reserve Banking System, the people of this land are set to continue to suffer either by shock or attrition, and this to the benefit of large international bank shareholders.

(xi)          However for this scenario to reach its logical conclusion (maximum benefit for bankers and maximum loss for the people of this land), there needs to be a vehicle and a roadmap for the complete securitisation of the people’s labour and resources.

(xii)         The vehicle is Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Zealand, registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, registrant # 216105$/SEC/Registrant.asp?CIK=216105, and the securitisation is set to occur via the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and also via the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, which is secret but appears to allow countries (as corporations) to be sued and asset-stripped by other corporations (including banks).

(xiii)        The Waitangi Treaty Settlement process is essential to this apparently intended wealth-transfer process, as on the face of it it removes the claim of the indigenous people of the land to their taonga, which are supposed to be undisturbed, and places the ownership of remaining taonga after Tiriti breaches in commercial Post-Settlement Governance Entity vehicles subject to the crown and subject to bankruptcy via commerce and the Fractional Reserve Banking System and gives the Crown ultimate title that it can use to secure loans that probably cannot be repaid. This process also seems itself to be a breach of Te Tiriti.

(xiv)       Further, Constitutional change is essential to this apparently intended wealth-transfer process, to fully release all claims so that securitisation can occur. None of this is in the interests of the people. So let me quote something itself quoted by Wellington’s principal law school, at :

He aha te mea nui o te ao? He tangata, he tangata, he tangata!  – What is the most important thing in the world? It is people, people, people!

You should note that it is also tikanga.

9. Given all of the above, and given that you occupy a position of trust with the people of this country, I urge you to serve the most important thing, the people, and immediately recuse yourselves from the Constitutional Advisory Panel and this process of constitutional change, which appears to be merely part of a mechanism to impoverish the nation for the benefit of overseas corporations and bankers.

10. You should also take notice that a breach of trust, especially in relation to a country and its people, is defined in law as Treason.

11. If you need any clarification on any of the above, please contact me in the first instance via [address not for publication]

Guy Christopher (family name Ralls) / Kahukura Peita.

All rights reserved. Signed copy to follow.

* [submission] is for Noticing Purposes exclusively, and reserving all rights. Sent to on 31 July 2013 before 5pm US EST and local time for Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, District of Columbia, place of registration for the corporation known as Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Zealand.

Share on Facebook donate


Share on Facebook

Food Bill: Picture says 104,261 words

Congratulations to cartoonist Mike Moreu of Nelson, NZ, for distilling the truth from the Food Bill. It serves big business, not grannies, and certainly not you.

And yes, it really is 104,261 words long. That’s like the length of a novel, plus it’s a bunch harder to read.

This image appeared in the Nelson Mail on 14 February, 2012. Reproduced with permission from the artist.

Share on Facebookdonate

Share on Facebook

Use the the Natural Health Products Bill to counter the Food Bill

Share widely – urgent – make this go viral please

Make an all-rights-reserved “Submission” on the Natural Health Products Bill, the Food Bill’s essential Codex Alimentarius counterpart, to attack the Food Bill and Codex Alimentarius by proxy and to oppose the NHP Bill itself (it sucks completely anyway, as you will discover).

The closing date for submissions is 24 February 2012.

This page shows you how to do this, why, and provides a suggested template at bottom for the text of your “submission” / notification, which you can post online to the Select Committee. The process takes no more than a few minutes. The Government has refused to reopen submissions on the Food Bill. Use this process to have your say about the Food Bill, the NHP Bill and above all, about Codex Alimentarius – and to give notice that you retain all your rights at the same time.

Share on Facebook donate

Kill the Natural Health Products Bill, kill the Food Bill.

The Food Bill is one leg of New Zealand’s compliance with Codex Alimentarius, the “Food Book” set of international food regulations being forced upon all World Trade Organisation states. The Natural Health Products Bill is the other leg.

Both legs will kick New Zealanders in the guts by benefiting international trade and multinational agribusiness / pharmaceutical corporations at the expense of our own food and health rights. That is what Codex Alimentarius is all about.

However, if the Natural Health Products Bill can be killed using the Select Committee process, combined with public outrage, then the Food Bill could be repealed without loss to the country in trade terms.

This is because killing the NHP Bill would void New Zealand’s Codex Alimentarius compliance. Codex compliance is NOT in your interests, be sure of that. And with NZ’s Codex compliance voided, there is no reason for the Food Bill to exist at all.

The idea is to cut off one leg and the body will fall over, taking the other leg with it. Will it work? There is only one way to find out.

You’ll want to oppose the Natural Health Products Bill in any case. It is outrageous – and, luckily, very easy to read. Let’s try to bring it down.

What’s wrong with the NHP Bill itself?

It makes it illegal without a licence to prepare, share or administer anything (that isn’t presented as “food”) that’s made from plants, vitamins, minerals or anything else natural and may have any of the following material health benefits:-

The maintenance or promotion of health or wellness; nutritional support; vitamin or mineral supplementation; affecting or maintaining the structure or function of the body; effective treatment of any self-diagnosed or self-managed condition.

Now, go back and read that again!

You’ll be liable for a $50,000 fine for doing any of the above, even for yourself. No more home-grown camomile tea to make you sleep better. No more practising of traditional Maori medicine without a government ticket, which can be denied or revoked. No more home-made manuka oil to put on your cuts. No more using your granny’s remedies from the herb garden. None of this without permission, fees and rules, or you face massive fines and possibly jail. Sound familiar?

Now, you may not actually do these things. But you may wish to retain the right to do so. You may also wish to use any of these products or services in future. But under the NHP Bill they will be more expensive and much harder to find, because most practitioners / producers will be regulated and compliance-costed out of existence.

Don’t take our word for all this. Read the bill. It’s very easy to read, unlike the Food Bill, and easy to see the intent. It is the same intent as the Food Bill. The government wishes to own what goes into you (and thus own you). They say it is all for your safety, of course. Do you still believe that?

Take note: The Natural Health Products Bill was, like the Food Bill, passed at a first reading UNAMINOUSLY. EVERY MP voted for it. And the bill itself was a proud product of cooperation between the Green Party and National.

Are you getting wise to the Green Party yet? And are you getting wise to Parliament itself?

The NHP bill is here:

In reading the NHP Bill, pay close attention to sections 5 (definitions), 6 (what is a natural health product), 20 and 21 (powers of the new health police) 28, 29 and 30 (requirements for licensing) 37 and 38 (penalties), 45 (delegation of powers to corporations), 47 (regulations applying to licensed practitioners – these will be CODEX regulations) and LAST BUT VERY IMPORTANT the Schedule of “Suitable classes of substances”… this is basically everything you ingest that is not food (which is already covered by the Food Bill) – so plants, extracts thereof, minerals, vitamins, amino acids etc that are taken to promote wellbeing. The stuff that, along with food itself, is essential for your life.

Share on Facebook donate

Making a “submission” on the Natural Health Products Bill.

We don’t recommend that you “submit” your say, in a sense of law, on this Bill. “Submitting” means “bowing down” and giving up all the rights you presumably wish to retain. You need to reserve all your rights. This can all be made clear in the “submission” process.

Numbers are important here. We need to flood the Select Committee with responses voicing disapproval of the Natural Health Products Bill and Codex Alimentarius, and by extension the Food Bill. This might just kill the Food Bill by proxy, by killing its Codex counterpart and stopping Codex from being implemented.

So please SHARE this info widely, and fast. The deadline is Friday, 24 February 2012. Please especially get this into health food groups etc on Facebook and beyond.

What to write

If you’re outraged, express it. At the bottom of what you write, write All Rights Reserved.

We’d suggest that the main thing to get across is opposition to Codex Alimentarius being imposed upon New Zealanders through the Natural Health Products Bill and the Food Bill. Codex does not serve people, it serves corporations.

Keep a copy of what you write. But please do write something. This needs many people to make it work. New Zealand is sleepwalking towards a corporate police state.

If you wish, you can also choose to talk / shout about your concerns at an actual Select Committee hearing. We think this would be a very good idea.

Finally if you really want to make the Select Committee sit up, send the suggested text below or some variation thereof and put its members on their Oaths of Office. If they screw up, they are out of Office, or worse.

Make your “submission” on the Natural Health Products Bill here, by scrolling to the bottom of the page:

[Note: If the link is changed (not unlikely) then you should still be able to navigate to the NHP Bill submissions page by following this path: Home ( > Parliamentary business > Select committees > Make a submission. The “Make a submission” page is currently at Get to the NHP Bill submission page itself by choosing Health Committee from the drop-down list of Select Committees, then hit go. Scroll to the bottom of the page that comes up to enter the captcha code and make the “submission”.]

Suggested text:


To the Select Committee for the Natural Health Products Bill

1 TAKE NOTICE that those Members of Parliament on the Select Committee have sworn to serve the Queen according to Law, and the Natural Health Products Bill appears to be unlawful serving as it does foreign interests and not the interests of the country of New Zealand, this because it has been introduced into New Zealand together with the Food Bill as part of this country’s compliance with CODEX ALIMENTARIUS, a World Trade Organisation directive that supports international trade agreements at the expense of the natural God-given rights of the people of this land to feed themselves and treat their own ailments themselves in any way they best see fit.

2 TAKE NOTICE that I have not seen any evidence that CODEX ALIMENTARIUS serves the people of this land and I believe that no such evidence exists.

3 TAKE NOTICE that I have not seen any evidence that the Natural Health Products Bill serves the people of this land and I believe that no such evidence exists.

4 TAKE NOTICE that I have not seen any evidence that the Natural Health Products Bill together with the Food Bill representing as they do this country’s efforts to meet the World Trade Organisation’s CODEX ALIMENTARIUS guidelines serves the people of this land and I believe that no such evidence exists.

5 TAKE NOTICE that I have not seen any evidence that the Natural Health Products Bill together with the Food Bill and New Zealand’s efforts to implement the CODEX ALIMENTARIUS guidelines is not in essence treasonous and a breach of te Tiriti o Waitangi on the issue of taonga or treasures at the very least and I believe that no such evidence exists.

5 TAKE NOTICE that it is my belief that the Select Committee members should provide evidence in their findings and recommendations to Parliament that my concerns at paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 5 above are completely unfounded, with the same to be provided upon their respective Oaths of Office, before they individually or collectively make any implicit or explicit recommendation by act or omission that the Natural Health Products Bill should in any way whatsoever be moved to a second reading in Parliament.

[6, 7 etc… My other concerns about the Natural Health Products Bill are… delete this or add in as appropriate, removing the square brackets and writing to a MAXIMUM TOTAL OF 4000 CHARACTERS. You have about 1500 characters left.]

Yours truly

[Given name], [middle name] of the family [family name]

A man/woman [delete as appropriate]. In plain English. This is a submission made only in the common usage sense of information being transferred over the internet. All rights reserved.

Share on Facebookdonate


Share on Facebook


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 136 other followers

%d bloggers like this: