NZ Food Security is into its third year, and after a lengthy absence we’ve decided to get things rolling again – this time with the publishing of a formal notice to the NZ Constitutional Advisory Panel, which closed to submissions today. It was written by the journalist who first broke the story on the Food Bill’s problems in Organic NZ magazine, and is copied below.
Meanwhile, the serious issues with the Food Bill are far from being fixed, despite it getting a new face in the form of MP Nikki Kaye following Kate Wilkinson’s departure. In particular, there is minimal transparency in relation to the changes apparently being undertaken in response to the huge public outcry that we are very happy you, the New Zealand public, made over the bill. Check back here for a summary soon.
More broadly, the Crown seems to be merely dishing up more rights-depleting legislation for the country in the form of the GCSB and TPPA Bills (and probably a bunch of others we are not even aware of).
On the positive side, however, very large numbers of people do seem to be waking up to the fact that all is not as it seems on TV – and that a bunch of control-freak globalists are indeed trying to line their dirty little pockets with the wealth of New Zealand.
Waking up is quite different, of course, from getting out of bed and doing something. But it’s a step in the right direction. Don’t let the day run away with you
31 July 2013
To the Members of the Constitutional Advisory Panel as described at http://www.cap.govt.nz/ via email@example.com
for the attention of all people living in the land commonly
known as New Zealand
Guy Christopher (family name Ralls), adopted as Kahukura Peita under tikanga by Hone Peita, Rangatira of Te Wairaki hapu, Panguru, Aotearoa / the North Island of the landmass commonly referred to as New Zealand.
Emeritus Professor John Burrows QC, Sir Tipene O’Regan, Ngāi Tahu; Peter Chin; Deborah Coddington; Hon Sir Michael Cullen; Hon John Luxton; Bernice Mene; Dr Leonie Pihama, Te Ātiawa, Ngā Māhanga a Tairi, Ngāti Māhanga; Hinurewa Poutu, Ngāti Rangi, Te Āti Haunui a Pāpārangi, Ngāti Maniapoto; Professor Linda Tuhiwai Smith, Ngāti Awa, Ngāti Porou; Peter Tennent; Dr Ranginui Walker, Te Whakatōhea; and anyone else appointed to the Constitutional Advisory Panel as described at http://www.cap.govt.nz/ from time to time by New Zealand Government representatives of the foreign entity registered with United States Securities and Exchange Commission known as Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Zealand, registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, registrant # 216105 http://www.secinfo.com/$/SEC/Registrant.asp?CIK=216105
Capacity in which this Notice is made: by myself as a whangai, that is as a adoptive native of this land, with all of the rights and privileges of a British subject but without subjugation; and as a beneficiary of the Express Trust constituted by both He Whakaputanga 1835 The Declaration of Independence of Niu Tireni which was given Royal Assent by means of Letters Patent by King William IV and ratified by the British Parliament and its subsequent variation Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840 indigenous version, which is superior to the English version of the same year under the International Law rule of Contra Proferentem on the issue of Sovereignty, that is, with the Sovereignty of this land being retained by the Rangatira of the various districts under Tino Rangatiranga.
Take Notice That:
1 The process that you are individually involved in regarding possible changes to New Zealand’s constitutional arrangements is an internal process of the New Zealand Crown corporation known as Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Zealand registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, registrant # 216105 http://www.secinfo.com/$/SEC/Registrant.asp?CIK=216105.
2 Being an internal process of that corporation, the process is bypassing the True Foundational Constitution of this land commonly known as New Zealand but constitutionally in fact Niu Tireni, that being He Whakaputanga 1835 The Declaration of Independence and its subsequent variation, Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840 indigenous version.
3 This True Foundational Constitution is an arrangement between the Rangatira of the various rohe or districts of this land by blood and the heirs and successors of King William IV, and is an Express Trust created for the benefit of the men, women and children living in this land.
4 This True Foundational Constitution can not be amended or annulled by any arrangement explicit, implicit or otherwise between the New Zealand Crown corporation known as Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Zealand and legal persons subject to that corporation as the aforementioned corporation and legal persons were not and are not parties to the agreement that created the True Foundational Constitution of this land (being He Whakaputanga 1835 The Declaration of Independence and its subsequent variation, Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840 the indigenous version).
5 Furthermore the Constitutional Advisory Panel that you are each individually party to is only of an Advisory nature, is only reflective of views of persons not necessarily verified to have any standing in respect of any Constitutional amendments, has no ability to contract and is itself appointed by representatives of the aforementioned corporation who appear legally to be under no obligation whatsoever to act on the views of the people of this land that you may or may not accurately communicate to them.
6 However notwithstanding the above, the process has been put to the people living in this land as a lawful means of bringing changes to the True Foundational Constitution of this land when it is not. This appears to be a general breach of the trust of the people of this land, as well as an explicit breach either by impost or delegation of the Express Trust, True Foundational Constitution of this land (being He Whakaputanga 1835 The Declaration of Independence and its subsequent variation, Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840 the indigenous version).
7. These breaches could cause actual loss or harm to the beneficiaries of this Express Trust as well as to the Rangatira by blood to the original signatories of the agreement between themselves and King William IV and their hapu, that is both to the non-indigenous and indigenous people of this land.
8. The actual loss or harm could principally but not exclusively come about in the following manner subsequent to the Protections of the Express Trust True Foundational Constitution of this land being removed (whether in appearance or in actuality):-
(i) By the acquisition of property by corporations subject to the Crown by means of fraudulent bank lending practices under this land’s Fractional Reserve Banking System whereby land or other property is used as security for funds that purport to be derived from Loans / Lending but are in fact debt-based funds created directly by a loan application processes (this Fractional Reserve Banking System being approved and supported by the New Zealand Government).
(ii) These debt-based funds can only be created (and a subsequent apparent debt incurred) in this system if there is a corresponding credit balance in any bank’s balance sheet. Thus the amount of debt in circulation is subject to the amount of credit, and the money supply is grown through a dualistic credit / debt monetary system, devaluing savings.
(iii) Due to the interest differential between the credit side and debit sides of the general public banking balance sheet (where debts incur higher rates than credits are paid) this dualistic monetary system inevitably results in a much larger amount of public debt being owed than there is public credit (“money”) to service it.
(iv) At this point (which we have been at since 2008) people in this land inevitably lose property to banks due to debt. However these debts were all initially incurred by fraud, purporting to be from loans when in fact no money was lent but the money merely created by the apparent loan process.
(v) Furthermore, when the amount of credit (“money”) in circulation needs to be increased to stop a complete financial collapse as nearly seen in 2008, any government needs to create bonds to raise credit via its central bank for introduction into the monetary supply. The bonds in this land are largely created, it seems, against the labour of our men and women through a growing multiplicity of statutory fines, taxes and governmental fees, as well as via international lending secured against the taonga (minerals, resources) of this land that are supposed to be protected under the True Foundational Constitution of this land but could be lost if the national debt cannot be repaid.
(vi) This banking system is predatory and fraudulent, and the people of this land are collectively suffering as a result. Furthermore this system has been standard banking practice since money ceased to be backed by anything of substance in this land, such as gold, and it has resulted in a large transfer of wealth from the people to bank shareholders.
(vii) This banking system through its necessary banking bailouts and bond creation creates servitude and diminishes the quality of life of the people of this country.
(viii) Ultimately the beneficiaries of this banking system are the principal shareholders of the largest and oldest banks – banks that are large enough to buy up failing banks along with the securities those failed banks acquired on their fraudulent loans; banks that are large enough to finance governments in exchange for securities on the human labour of the people (via court bonds, increased taxes etc) and the resources of their country.
(ix) Thus through the processes of commerce and banking taking place in this land, as overseen by “former” banker and Prime Minister of Government John Key, the actual beneficiaries of the production and resources of this land appear to be generally Mr Key’s former employers (large bank shareholders and their associates) and not the people of New Zealand, who are supposed to be benefiting from the True Foundational Constitution of this land but are not.
(x) Via complete banking collapse or the continuous bailouts that are the inevitable result of the Fractional Reserve Banking System, the people of this land are set to continue to suffer either by shock or attrition, and this to the benefit of large international bank shareholders.
(xi) However for this scenario to reach its logical conclusion (maximum benefit for bankers and maximum loss for the people of this land), there needs to be a vehicle and a roadmap for the complete securitisation of the people’s labour and resources.
(xii) The vehicle is Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Zealand, registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, registrant # 216105 http://www.secinfo.com/$/SEC/Registrant.asp?CIK=216105, and the securitisation is set to occur via the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and also via the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, which is secret but appears to allow countries (as corporations) to be sued and asset-stripped by other corporations (including banks).
(xiii) The Waitangi Treaty Settlement process is essential to this apparently intended wealth-transfer process, as on the face of it it removes the claim of the indigenous people of the land to their taonga, which are supposed to be undisturbed, and places the ownership of remaining taonga after Tiriti breaches in commercial Post-Settlement Governance Entity vehicles subject to the crown and subject to bankruptcy via commerce and the Fractional Reserve Banking System and gives the Crown ultimate title that it can use to secure loans that probably cannot be repaid. This process also seems itself to be a breach of Te Tiriti.
(xiv) Further, Constitutional change is essential to this apparently intended wealth-transfer process, to fully release all claims so that securitisation can occur. None of this is in the interests of the people. So let me quote something itself quoted by Wellington’s principal law school, at http://www.victoria.ac.nz/law/ :
He aha te mea nui o te ao? He tangata, he tangata, he tangata! – What is the most important thing in the world? It is people, people, people!
You should note that it is also tikanga.
9. Given all of the above, and given that you occupy a position of trust with the people of this country, I urge you to serve the most important thing, the people, and immediately recuse yourselves from the Constitutional Advisory Panel and this process of constitutional change, which appears to be merely part of a mechanism to impoverish the nation for the benefit of overseas corporations and bankers.
10. You should also take notice that a breach of trust, especially in relation to a country and its people, is defined in law as Treason.
11. If you need any clarification on any of the above, please contact me in the first instance via [address not for publication]
Guy Christopher (family name Ralls) / Kahukura Peita.
All rights reserved. Signed copy to follow.
* [submission] is for Noticing Purposes exclusively, and reserving all rights. Sent to firstname.lastname@example.org on 31 July 2013 before 5pm US EST and local time for Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, District of Columbia, place of registration for the corporation known as Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Zealand.